patrol recently in Japan over the Diaoyu Islands in China offshore fishing

 Patrol recently in Japan over the Diaoyu Islands in China offshore fishing boat hit the button and the captain, people could not help think of, since mid-2004, Japan's unilateral so-called sovereignty dispute in the East China Sea, but also highlighted in both the sovereignty of Diaoyu Island dispute.

the past, Japan on the Diaoyu Island and its waters, adopted the so-called Now, it seems that Japan has begun seeking to occupy waters of Diaoyu Island and its open. Not long ago, a number of islands of Japan announced the

then, the Japanese island of fishing (in view of the Diaoyu Islands in Chinese historical records known as the Ming and Qing Island fishing, fishing island; and Island, also known as To stand our ground it? Sovereignty dispute in the East China Sea and its related historical situation? This information to be summarized from the findings of the analysis.

one claim to sovereignty over the Japanese island of fishing grounds and whether justified

territorial sovereignty disputes in the general evaluation of the criteria? Generally believed that such sovereignty several criteria: Who first discovered; the first business development; and long-term exercise exclusive jurisdiction.

The Japanese government has claimed sovereignty over the Diaoyu Island said based on reason or even want to land

However, the facts are: Back in the early Ming Dynasty, fishing islands as Chinese territory had been clear, Ming and Qing dynasties were designated as the fishing islands within the jurisdiction of coastal defense, not the main land.

these, Japan is not do not know. But in 1895 the Qing government of Japan to take advantage of the Sino licked, in the .

Japan's Okinawa Prefecture is currently governed, in the back some 125 years ago, Okinawa was an independent country. Began in Japan in 1871 before the annexation of the Ryukyu States, China and the Ryukyu state had been about 500 years history of friendly exchanges, contacts between China and the Ryukyu historical documents can prove that the first discovered and named the Diaoyu islands, is China. Japan's so-called first

and the famous Japanese historian INOUE also authored a 1972 monograph entitled He pointed out that in the book, as a historian, historical documents and he determined after inspection: prior to the Diaoyu Islands in Japan, not to meddle in

Second, the Japanese government also said, placed under U.S. administration, so the United States to Japan will host the region, the natural territory of Japan, and China has never raised any objection to this, so that China does not think part of it.

The relevant facts are: this . The Chinese Government considered to be illegal, invalid, and therefore must not be recognized.

1971.6 17, Japan and the U.S. signed the In response, Chinese Foreign Ministry on December 30, 1971 issued a statement strongly condemning the U.S. and Japanese governments openly to my fishing islands classified as Chinese people absolutely can not tolerate. sovereignty. Move the U.S. and Japan, the results lead to 70 years all over the world including the United States to defend the Diaoyu Islands Chinese wave of movement. In this case, the U.S. government had in October 1971, said: in which the transfer of executive power of these islands have before us the legal right, nor because of the executive power returned to Japan weakened the rights of other requirements. ... ... to this and other islands of the requirements of any dispute are to be parties to each other resolve matters. United States and Japan of any treaty or agreement between, not the territorial sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands have decided the legal effect. Japan to the US-Japan Treaty, the agreement as the basis, assert the sovereignty of fishing island and its waters, is invalid and absurd.

Third, the Japanese continue to create

This may be the Japanese wanted to In fact, the so-called jurisprudence. Moreover,

fishing island of Japan's sovereignty claim has

Second, the sovereignty of the Ryukyus in Japan is still the in the history of Ryukyu waters are as boundaries, fishing and the Ryukyu islands would have been only for the community. So to talk about the Sino-Japanese maritime border, but also look at the history of Ryukyu, Ryukyu Relations fancy historical facts.

and if on the Ryukyu (Okinawa), some scholars also believe that, in terms of international law and internationally recognized, until now, sovereignty over the Ryukyu Islands still belong to Japan, not Japanese territory.

This goes back 120 years and after World War II. According to the data, now dating back some 125 years ago, Okinawa was an independent Ryukyu country. Japan, in 1879 the Ryukyu Kingdom by force embezzled, and Okinawa implementation of But the Ryukyu Kingdom, but with seven years of cultural accumulation of the propriety of the state, in Japan, long-term comprehensive palace and the traditional royal guards. US-Japan Okinawa until 1945, the last-minute battle, the Japanese brutally dispersed the last symbol of the independent Ryukyu ─ ─ royal guards, the palace in the war was razed to the ground.

during World War II, according to the According to the Japan surrendered unconditionally fully accepted the November 26, 1943 in the United States, Britain, the Soviet Union four countries. Ryukyu Islands, in the

only, has information that the United States after World War II to please the Japanese, then the secret to three hundred million more than twenty million U.S. dollars in a very low price, the Ryukyu Islands and China's inherent territory government facilities Diaoyu Island Shi regime After World War II the United States hosted the Ryukyu Islands, according to the principles of international law, the United States should let the Ryukyu Islands of recovery. The United States did not receive the the force of law, not to mention the secret financial transactions, and it is illegal null and void.

view of this, we can see in the Okinawa Japan (the Ryukyu) sovereignty is

However, you have to Gentlemen of Japan, you should not think about: the primary ownership of the Ryukyus in Japan, has not been internationally recognized, but added that its share should not be or notice, without mentioning the sovereignty of Diaoyu Island in Japan? - This is not

Third, the Chinese Now look at China's fishing island in the East China Sea and the Sino-Japanese dispute, in fact, even when reason's. But China is still

view of Japan on the Diaoyu Islands have different ideas on issues such as the Chinese government starting from the development of China-Japan relations, China's consistent stand of adhering to the premise, it may conclude with Japan to resolve this issue until later, do not take unilateral action to avoid interference with the issue of understanding the overall situation of bilateral relations.

China has been handled by this principle, in practical action to set aside disputes, and Japan in the two disputed Diaoyu Islands and other regional areas such unilateral action, but another, frequently driving the mainland and Taiwan fishing boats events.

2008.6 18, China and Japan also announced interim transition agreement, although the natural extension of the continental shelf boundary. It may also show that China's However, Japan in the Sino-Japanese East China Sea, fishing on the island sovereignty, but often This is consistent

stands to reason,

Japan to the Chinese people if the Chinese people can not can not be

(Wen Qing)